Sources & Research Methodology
Zug DAO's editorial content is built on primary and authoritative secondary sources. Our research methodology prioritizes official government publications and regulatory filings from Swiss federal and cantonal authorities, including FINMA guidance documents, Federal Council dispatches, and Swiss Commercial Registry data. We supplement these with peer-reviewed academic research, institutional reports from organizations such as the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Economic Forum, and verified data from established industry research providers.
When citing statistics, projections, or market data, we identify the originating source and publication date. We distinguish between verified data, estimates, and projections, and we note the methodology behind cited figures where available. We do not cite anonymous sources without editorial justification, and we do not publish unverified claims as fact.
Fact-Checking Process
All editorial content undergoes a multi-stage verification process before publication. Factual claims are cross-referenced against at least two independent sources where possible. Regulatory analysis is reviewed against the primary legal text of the relevant statute or guideline. Financial data is verified against official filings or recognized data providers. Where claims cannot be independently verified, we note this limitation explicitly in the text.
Our editorial team includes contributors with direct experience in Swiss financial regulation, financial services technology, and institutional investment. Subject-matter experts review technical content within their area of expertise prior to publication.
Update Frequency & Currency
Zug DAO publishes new editorial content on a regular basis, with the goal of maintaining a weekly publication cadence for analysis articles and a quarterly cadence for comprehensive sector reports. Existing content is reviewed on a quarterly basis to ensure accuracy, with data points updated as new official reports become available. All articles display their original publication date and most recent modification date.
Correction Policy
We take factual accuracy seriously. When errors are identified — whether by our editorial team, our readers, or external sources — we correct them promptly. Corrections are noted at the top of the affected article with a dated correction note identifying the nature of the error and the change made. We do not silently edit published content. Substantive corrections are accompanied by a brief explanatory note. Minor corrections (typographical errors, formatting issues) are made without notation.
Readers who identify potential errors are encouraged to contact us at [email protected].
Editorial Independence
Zug DAO maintains complete independence in all editorial decisions. No advertiser, sponsor, partner, or external party has any influence over the topics we cover, the analysis we publish, or the conclusions we reach. Advertising and editorial functions are strictly separated. Advertisers are never informed of editorial content prior to publication. We have no commercial relationship with the Canton of Zug, its Economic Promotion office, or any entity covered in our editorial content.
Data Standards & Statistical Accuracy
When presenting quantitative data — including tax rates, company revenues, employee counts, market valuations, and economic indicators — we adhere to strict sourcing protocols. Tax rate calculations are derived from official cantonal and federal publications and verified against analyses from Big Four accounting firms (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) and leading Swiss law firms (Lenz & Staehelin, Bär & Karrer, Homburger). Company-specific data is sourced from official filings, annual reports, and verified databases such as the Zug Commercial Register (regindex.ch), Moneyhouse, SIX Swiss Exchange disclosures, and established financial data providers.
Where data points cannot be independently verified through official sources — for example, where cantonal promotion materials provide estimates rather than audited figures — we note this limitation and provide context for the reader to evaluate the reliability of the information. We distinguish clearly between verified data, estimates, projections, and opinions.
Content Review Process
Prior to publication, all content undergoes a multi-stage review process. The author conducts initial research and drafting. A senior editor reviews the piece for analytical rigor, factual accuracy, source quality, and editorial consistency. Where the content involves technical subject matter — such as STAF calculations, OECD Pillar Two implementation details, or FINMA regulatory interpretations — a subject-matter expert with relevant professional experience reviews the technical claims. Final approval is granted by the editor-in-chief. This process ensures that published content meets the institutional quality standard our audience expects.
Disclosure & Conflicts of Interest
Zug DAO and its editorial team may hold positions in digital assets, equity interests, or other investments in companies covered in our content. Where a material conflict of interest exists, we disclose it prominently within the relevant article. We do not accept payment, tokens, equity, or other consideration in exchange for editorial coverage. Sponsored content, if published, is clearly labeled and visually separated from editorial content. Affiliate relationships are disclosed in accordance with applicable Swiss advertising regulations and clearly marked where they appear.
Author Qualifications
All editorial content is produced by professionals with demonstrable expertise in their subject area. Our team includes individuals with backgrounds in Swiss corporate law, cantonal and federal tax policy, financial services regulation (including FINMA supervision), life sciences cluster development, commodity trading, international business relocation, and economic policy. Founding editor Donovan Vanderbilt holds an MBA from Imperial College London with extensive experience in government advisory, institutional banking, and fintech entrepreneurship across European, Gulf, and African markets.
Reader Feedback & Corrections
We value reader feedback and take all substantive comments and correction requests seriously. If you identify a factual error, outdated data point, or analytical inconsistency in our content, please contact us at [email protected]. All credible correction requests are reviewed and, where verified, corrections are published promptly with dated notation. This policy was last updated on February 15, 2026.